I’m not a Wall Street lawyer, so I’m asking a novice question here, but I would like to know why the synthetic CDOs created by Goldman Sachs aren’t considered “wagering contracts” void under New York state law? Before I read Michael Lewis’s fantastic book “The Big Short” I had never heard of synthetic CDOs. Lewis explained how Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firms created synthetic CDOs to allow investors to place a bet on the probability that subprime mortgages would pay off. The synthetic CDOs allowed investors to bet on the mortgages without having any ownership interests in the mortgages themselves. It was purely and simply a gamble. Investors who believed the mortgages were healthy could go “long” on a synthetic CDO, while investors who thought the mortgages would default could go “short.” If the mortgages defaulted (as they did), the shorts made fortunes, while the institutional longs lost fortunes. [click to continue…]
{ 0 comments }
What can we do together? Since 1999 I've been using the Internet, websites, blogs, online video, Twitter and other social media to help thousands of injured people find great lawyers. We've organized national networks of lawyers in over forty states to take on Pfizer, Bayer, Yamaha and other multinational corporations. We've put consumers on a level playing field, and had fun doing it. If you're a great lawyer looking for more clients, contact me and let's see what we can do together.
Use the Contact Form or connect with me on