From the category archives:

Online Legal Marketing

As I’ve mentioned on this blog before, I’m involved in an Internet campaign to spread information and make legal services available to people who have had the misfortune to find Chinese drywall installed in their homes or businesses.  As we’ve done many times over the past decade, my partner and I have organized an alliance of law firms in multiple states, with lawyers licensed to practice law in most of states with significant numbers of cases, including Louisiana, Florida, Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama and many others.  I’ll state at the outset that I believe that the only way a homeowner with a Chinese drywall problem is going to get the problem fixed is to file a lawsuit, either by joining in the MDL in New Orleans, or by filing an individual lawsuit against the builder and suppliers.  I do not recommend that anyone wait around for the Consumer Product Safety Commission or some other governmental agency to fix their homes.  And I believe that any delay by a homeowner before filing suit is simply time he or she loses in getting the money to replace the drywall.

When I began this project, I believed it would follow the same course as previous mass tort projects on which I have worked since 2000; cases such as those involving the deadly liver drug Rezulin, the cholestoral drug Baycol, artificial Sulzer Hip and Knee Joints, Diet Drug Litigation (diet drugs caused heart damage and primary pulmonary hypertension (a potentially life-threatening lung condition) among many people who had no history of heart problems), Yamaha Rhino rollovers (caused by design defects in the Rhinos), etc.  I expected to create one or more websites that was full of information, optimize the website so it could be easily found by searchers who were looking for the information and services we offered, and make it as easy as possible for those people become informed and retain us if they wanted to do so.

This project has been somewhat different.  Although we are getting substantial traffic to our website, and are talking to a number of people on the telephone and are reviewing a number of case review forms, I am getting the sense that, compared with our previous mass tort cases, a higher percentage of CDW victims don’t seem to know what to do.

I have my own hypothesis.  I can’t remember being involved in a mass tort in which so many politicians and governement agencies are involved.  Every politician seems to want to express his/her outrage, particularly if his/her constituents are affected by the problem.  And the relevant governmental agencies feel obligated to release reports, even if the reports don’t really reach any conclusions.  Then the politicians go back and complain about the slow manner in which the government is dealing with the problem, and several dozen news articles are written or put on television everytime one of these things happens.  A Google News search today for “Chinese drywall” returns 922 articles.  And none of them provide real, comprehensive advice about how the homeowner can get the problem resolved.  If a person runs a Google search for the commonly-searched term “Chinese sheetrock,” a post I wrote on our Chinese Drywall Attorney Alliance site is the top-ranked lawyer-provided page.  But it still doesn’t appear in the top ten results on Google.

For example, on Nov. 23, 2009, the lawyers for the Consumer Product Safety Commission wrote a letter to Senators Bill Newlson and Mark Warner, and representatives Jim Webb and Glenn Nye.  A great deal of waffling is found in the letter, which concedes that investigators eyes were irritated when they inspected homes with Chinese drywall (CDW), but the letter didn’t make a single recommendation telling people what they should do.

I admit I have bemoaned the ugly Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs) sometimes created by Google when someone searches for a mass-tort related term.  Somehow, it appears slightly hucksterish to see all those page titles saying “[name your tort or defective product] Lawsuit, lawyer, attorney, law firm….”  But if you run a Google search for “Chinese drywall” the top ten results are news results (as of Thanksgiving day 2009).  None of the news articles offers help getting the money to remove and replace your drywall.  I’m as big a news junkie as anyone (hey, Google News is my homepage), but the integration of News results into Google web search seems to be going a bit too far.  I still believe many people search Google News for news articles, but search Google web for more in-depth information and the type information they need to solve problems.

Am I forgetting the ability of lawyers to appear at the time of Google by purchasing pay-per-click ads? No, but the most recent data I saw on the issue still indicates that people are about twice as likely to click on an organic (natural) listing rather than a pay-per-click listing.  Even though I sometimes use pay-per-click ads, I still believe at least a few good legal marketers should be able to find their way to put genuinely helpful information onto the first page of Google’s results with the necessity of resorting to pay-per-click advertising.

There may be other instances in which the heavy integration of traditional news into the top of Google’s web search results are beneficial, but I don’t think it’s helping CDW victims who are trying to decide what they need to do to solve their CDW problem.  Call me a skeptic, but I don’t believe anyone is going to get his or her Chinese drywall problem solved by a person who walks up with a CPSC card and says “I’m from the government, and I’m here to help you.”  I think the challenge for those of us with information and services that can actually help Chinese drywall victims is to break through the noise that has been created by politicians, political agencies, and the news media, and continue putting out a message of clarity that is easily found by those who are searching for help with their Chinese drywall problems.

I expect to lauch ConsumerNews.com within weeks (after having fired and replaced a developer). Pro-consumer lawyers and others who want to communicate directly to consumers will have an avenue via that site, especially if they are communicating on a topic that is news-driven, such as Chinese drywall.  If you or your organization is interested in being a sponsor or advertiser on ConsumerNews.com, which will cover stories of interest to consumers from a distinctively pro-consumer point-of-view, please contact me.

{ 0 comments }

I’ve written before that attorneys who market over the Internet can gain a huge advantage from the use of well-optimized video.  As I mentioned in a post on the “Easiest way to a First Page Rank on Google“, Forrester Research has performed tests that show a video is 50 times more likely to be found on the first page of Google than a text page.

This has been consistently borne out in my own use of video in online legal marketing.  I’m involved in a project with other lawyers to represent victims of Yamaha Rhino rollovers.  We’ve posted two videos in connection with the project.  According to recent Wordtracker reports, the search term “Yamaha Rhino recall” is by far the most frequently searched term associated with Yamaha Rhinos.  I ran a Google search for “Yamaha Rhino recall” on October 7, 2009, and our two videos appeared in the top five results on Google’s first page.

Here’s a screenshot:

First page of a 10-7-09 Google search for "Yamaha Rhino recall"

First page of a 10-7-09 Google search for "Yamaha Rhino recall"

[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

SearchEngineWatch.com is reporting that Google is sponsoring a contest with a grand prize of $25,000 of cable television advertising.  Contestants create a 30 second or 60 second spot and upload it to the YouTube channel “TV for all contest.” You can even make the ad for free using SpotMixer.com.  The deadline for submission is October 5, 2009.  Viewers will vote, and 3 winners will be announced October 30, 2009.

This appears to be a good way for Google to call attention to the TV ad service it now offers through its AdWords program.  A MediaPost article reports that Google has teamed with SpotMixer to allow advertisers to create video ads to be displayed on the Google Content Network.  SpotMixer’s platform automatically converts an advertiser’s existing AdWords text ad into a tailored video ad within the advertiser’s AdWords account.  Earlier this year, SpotMixer launched a self-serve video ad creation service for Google AdWords customers to produce and distribute cable TV ads via Google TV Ads.

Lawyers who have been tempted to dip their toes into the TV advertising pool now have a way of giving it a try on a limited budget.  But the chance of a lawyer ad winning the $25,000 grand prize?  I’m pretty skeptical about that.

{ 0 comments }

As I concentrate more of my time and resources on ConsumerNews.com, I’ve decided to part with some legal domain names that I bought when I thought I might use them.  Names such as AsbestosReporter.com, ConsumerLawNetwork.com, and many more. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Years ago when pay-per-click ads were new, the first tests showed that searchers preferred to click on the links that appeared on the search page (”organic results”) rather clicking on than the pay-per-click ads.  I saw a recent comparison yesterday, when Gord Hotchkiss of Enquiro published an article saying results have remained remarkably steady over the past six years:  for commercial searches, about 70% of searchers click on organic results, while only 30% click on the pay-per-click ads.

This is important information for firms trying to decide how to allocate resources between pay-per-click campaigns and search engine optimization.

{ 0 comments }

We have been experimenting with online video since last year in our Yamaha Rhino project, with very good results.  So I was not surprised to see a Forrester Research blog post saying that an online video is 50 times more likely than a text page to appear on Google’s first page.  A big part of that is simply the huge disparity in the number of text pages and the number of videos.  Now that Google is including videos in its “blended search results,” a well-optimized video has a much better shot at a first-page ranking than a text page.  Forrester’s research meshes with our own experience.  Although we have many more text pages dealing with the Yamaha Rhino recall, a Google search for “Yamaha Rhino recall” on July 2, 2009, placed our two Rhino videos in the top 4 search results.  Message to consumer lawyers, include online video in your marketing plan.

Yamaha Rhino recall Google search results 7-2-09

Yamaha Rhino recall Google search results 7-2-09

{ 0 comments }

Mediapost reports that Google will launch AdSense for mobile on Wednesday.  Mobile content developers will be able to insert a small snippet of code into their pages; this will tell Google where to display an ad.  The ad targeting is contextual, similar to targeting that exists for AdSense partners.

A Google spokesperson said Google is also experimenting on ways to allow advertisers to bid for ad placement on specific applications.  Anybody want to buy an ad when an iPhone user Googles the location of the local jail?

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A recent report from The Nielsen Company contained some interesting statistics. It found that viewers of online video increased 12.8% in May vs. last year.  Over the same time, total video streams watched increased by 34.8% and time spent per viewer increased by 48.9%.  This shows there are more users, watching more videos, more often.  The 20-page Nielsen report on The Global Online Media Landscape is available free, online.

The Pew Internet Home Broadband Adoption report found that 63% of adult Americans now have access to broadband , compared to 55% in May, 2008.  Together the two studies suggest that lawyers would be well-advised to incorporate online video into their marketing strategy.

I have found that online video can be a very effective way to communicate with potential clients.  Lawyers who use online video to communicate with clients can actually give the potential client a better “feel” for the lawyer, making the potential client more comfortable contacting the lawyer (provided that the lawyer communicates well).  Additionally, because viewers have come to expect funny and/or outrageous videos online, it may be possible to create a video that makes your point more vividly in an online video than in a television or print ad.  For example, we posted a satirical video which made a strong statement about Yamaha’s failure to adequately deal with the safety problems of the Yamaha Rhino.  The video resulted in many views, plus favorable commentary in an article published on News.com.au.

Our thanks to Mediapost’s Video Insider for pointing us toward the Nielsen and Pew studies.

{ 0 comments }

An interesting article in Online Media Daily discusses a report released Wednesday by The Nielsen Co.   Charles Buchwalter, SVP of research and analytics at Nielsen Online, said “In recent years, the Internet has changed dramatically as people seek more personalized relationships online.  In particular, time spent on social networks and video sites has increased astronomically.”

More from the article: ” Internet users today tend to prefer sites that contain more specialized content, according to Nielsen. This change in preferences is seen in the fact that video and social networking sites have moved to the forefront, becoming the two fastest-growing categories in 2009.

The number of U.S. consumers who frequent online video destinations has climbed 339% since 2003, while time spent on video sites has shot up almost 2,000% over the same period. In the last year alone, unique viewers of online video grew 10%, while the number of streams grew 41%, the streams per user grew 27%, and the total minutes engaged with online video grew 71%.”

With these numbers, it’s not surprising that we are seeing some lawyers turning to online video as part of their marketing efforts.

{ 0 comments }

The Wisconsin Bar recently published an interesting article with 10 Internet marketing tips for new, small law firms.  While the article is sometimes short on specifics about implementing its suggestions, it is a very good beginning point for lawyers without experience in online legal marketing.  I’m just going to list the 10 headings here without the full text of the article; you can read the full article here.  I’m going to add some explanations/suggestions based on my own experience.

  1. Advertise Online.
  2. Invest in a professionally designed and developed web site.
  3. “Consumerize” your web site.
  4. Incorporate video on your site.  [The articles suggests that you "Develop an introductory video of the managing partner that showcases personality as well as expertise. Post the video on the web (and YouTube) and even consider a TV spot down the road."  My caveat, if the managing partner doesn't come across well on video, do not use the managing partner.  Use the lawyer who looks best and comes across as most genuine on video.  If you have to, and your bar regs permit it, hire a professional before you put up a video with a white-faced, stuttering managing partner.  Also, if you can afford it, spend the money to shoot a professional video.  You don't have to spend a fortune to hire a pro, and the results will be worth the money.   For ideas about using video that aren't limited to interviews with your managing partner, see my post "Use online video to do things you can't do on TV."]
  5. [click to continue…]

    { 0 comments }